Sydney Wilkinson
Island Civilization
Summary
English 101
In
this piece “Island Civilization: A Vision for Human Occupancy of Earth,”
Roderick Frazier Nash discusses his proposal of what the human race should do
in order to best preserve the earth and ensure its long life. He challenges humans to look beyond a
few years and consider the state of our earth now, and the future of our earth
in the fourth millennium if our lifestyles do not change.
Nash
first goes back into history to discuss how views on the wilderness have
changed over time. The destruction
of wilderness didn’t begin until humans made a distinct mental division of
“civilization” and “wilderness.”
Even as far back as biblical times, the wilderness has possessed a
negative reputation, for even God spoke badly about the wilderness. This lead to one of the first views
humans had on nature, which was to destruct and “tame” it. The European colonists found success in
conquering the land and looked down upon the Native Americans who had established
an equalitarian relationship with the wilderness. A shift in mindsets on nature occurred towards the end of
the second millennium when Henry David Thoreau and George Perkins Marsh
proposed widely publicized ideas about preserving the wilderness. It suddenly became evident to the human
race that their civilization of nature could in fact end up being destructive
toward themselves.
Due
to these authors and a United States Census that claimed there was no longer a
frontier, a movement favoring wilderness began. The motive behind the movement was purely to benefit the
human race. Towards the very end
of the second millennium, the movement favoring wilderness continued but the
motives changed. Humans began to
see that wilderness had an irreplaceable value and it should be preserved
simply because of that. For once
everything was not centered on mankind, preserving nature became a movement
solely centered around nature itself.
And as mankind continued to see the importance in nature, the issue of
preservation versus civilization eventually became a more, religious, and
ecological issue. Liberty Hyde
Bailey, a botanist, published a book claiming that God created nature as an
equal to humans, so rather than controlling nature, humans should respect and
reside among it. But eventually
this preservation mindset got pushed aside as the population grew rapidly, and
humans began conquering more and more land for habitation. Because of the carelessness and size of
the population, issues such as global warming, water, soil and food problems
are becoming a reality.
Looking
into the fourth millennium, Nash predicts four possibilities for our
planet. The first he tags “
Wasteland Scenario,” where the earth is wasting beneath our waste and trash,
simply rotting from poison and neglect.
The second scenario is “Garden Scenario” where mankind has occupied
every square inch of nature and molded it to benefit them. “Future primitive” is the third scenario
where humans revert back to the hunting and gathering way of life. And lastly he proposes his idea known
as “Island Civilization.” In this
scenario, civilization and nature are no longer separate spheres but civilization
adapts to become one with nature.
For this to occur, our world’s population would have to be at a maximum
of 1.5 billion. Humans would then
have to learn to live in smaller community spaces, rather than over occupying
the land as they’re used to. There
would be 100-mile closed-circle units each housing 3 million humans. Each unit is capable of supporting
itself for food, energy, and waste resources. On these units, nature will be impacted, but everywhere
outside these units will be left unchanged. Ideally, Nash’s idea of civilization depends on
teleportation because there will be no routes of travel such as roads that
alter the wilderness. Although
many humans would be against the idea, the harsh reality is that mankind holds
the key to the survival of the Earth, and the current civilization of the world
is slowly killing the Earth. But
there is always a possibility for change, leaving a possibility for hope.
Sydney focuses on the distinct division between civilization and wilderness, which is a division that mankind has implemented as common nature. Without wilderness, there would have been no need for civilization as there would have been nothing there to build off of. As time goes on, humans are forgetting that Earth is only one planet, with one lifetime. There is no rewind option, which is what Nash emphasizes in his essay. It is necessary for the current world population to start figuring out the next step because this is not a burden that can continue to be passed down. Still through of the harsh realities that the human races is facing, a small glimmer of hope shines as people realize that it is not too late to change and slowly, that glimmer of hope grows as more people become aware of the situation.
ReplyDelete